Accused card cheat using ‘Robin Hood’ defence

central london

One of the world’s top poker players was accused of using a ‘Robin Hood’ defence at the Supreme Court to overturn a ruling he won £7.7m by cheating at cards – in a case dubbed ‘The Battle of the Dictionaries’. American Phil Ivey, 40, claims he did not cheat because he honestly believed it was legal to use a technique known as edge-sorting while playing baccarat at Crockfords Club in London’s Mayfair in 2012. He sued the casino in 2014…

This content is for members with full access only.

Please upgrade your membership on your account page to access it.
Upgrade your account

Already a member? Log in here