A DRIVING INSTRUCTOR WHO BRUTALLY BATTERED TO DEAT
A DRIVING INSTRUCTOR WHO BRUTALLY BATTERED TO DEATH THE
‘NAGGING’ BOSS HE SECRETLY LOVED WAS JAILED FOR LIFE AT THE OLD
BAILEY ON MONDAY.
JOHN MCGUIRE, 44, SAVAGELY BATTERED THE MARRIED WOMAN WITH A
GARDEN SPADE 10 TIMES FLATTENING THE SIDE OF HER FACE, SAID MR ALAN
SUCKLING, QC, PROSECUTING.
THE RECORDER OF LONDON, SIR JAMES MISKIN, QC, DESCRIBED
MCGUIRE AS ‘A MENACE.
‘
DOCTORS REPORTS REVEALED THAT HE WAS SUFFERING FROM A
PERSONALITY DISORDER.
AFTER HIS ARREST MCGUIRE TOLD DETECTIVES: ‘SHE KEPT NAGGING
ME.
I JUST LOST CONTROL AND HIT HER.
‘
BUT IN A LETTER FOUND IN HIS POSSESSION, ADDRESSED TO HIS
BOSS, MRS CHRISTINE JACKSON, 35, HE SAID: ‘I LOVE YOU IN A WAY NOBODY
CAN UNDERSTAND.
I WOULD FIGHT THE WORLD FOR YOU.
‘
THE COURT HEARD THAT MCGUIRE HAD MET MRS JACKSON IN 1980.
THEY
HAD STARTED A DRIVING SCHOOL TOGETHER BUT IT FAILED.
AT THE TIME OF
THE MURDER MCGUIRE WAS WORKING FOR A FIRM RUN BY MRS JACKSON AND HER
HUSBAND, THE BASE DRIVING SCHOOL AT RAYNES PARK STATION.
.
MRS JACKSON HAD FORMERLY WORKED AS A PERSONNEL OFFICER FOR THE
DAILY MAIL NEWSPAPER.
MR SUCKLING SAID THAT MCGUIRE HAD SECRETLY WORSHIPPED MRS
JACKSON AND HE WOULD CALL HER DAY AND NIGHT.
BUT ON JULY 3 LAST YEAR HE WENT TO HER HOME AT ELM WALK,
RAYNES PARK, INTENT ON VIOLENCE.
HE STRUCK HER TEN TIMES WITH A
GARDEN SPADE.
‘HER SKULL WAS FRACTURED AND THE LEFT SIDE OF HER FACE
FLATTENED,’ SAID MR SUCKLING.
‘PARTS OF HER EAR WERE MISSING AND
EVERY BONE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF HER FACE WAS BROKEN.
‘
HE LATER TOLD A FRIEND: ‘SHE HAD BEEN NAGGING ME ALL WEEK.
SHE JUST WOULDN’T STOP.
‘
MCQUIRE, OF BUSHEY MANSIONS, GRAND DRIVE, WIMBLEDON, WAS
ACQUITTED OF MURDER AT HIS TRIAL LAST APRIL BUT CONVICTED OF
MANSLAUGHTER.
HE WAS THEN REMANDED IN CUSTODY FOR REPORTS UNTIL
SENTENCE WAS PASSED ON MONDAY.
WHEN THE JURY CLEARED HIM OF MURDER, ANGRY RELATIVES OF THE
DEAD WOMAN SHOUTED FROM THE PUBLIC GALLERY: ‘HE (MCGUIRE) HAS FOOLED
YOU.
‘
ONE OF THEM YELLED AT THE SHAKING MCGUIRE: ‘YOU’RE A DEAD
MAN.
‘
MCGUIRE HAD TOLD THE JURY HE COULD NOT REMEMBER HOW OR WHY
HE KILLED HER.
HE CLAIMED HE WAS SUFFERING FROM DIMINISHED
RESPONSIBILITY AT THE TIME AND HAD ‘SNAPPED’ WHEN SHE HAD – ACCORDING
TO HIM – NAGGED HIM ABOUT A CHEQUE.
END.
















