THE MARQUIS OF BLANDFORD WAS TODAY (THU) SENTENCED

THE MARQUIS OF BLANDFORD WAS TODAY (THU) SENTENCED TO TWO

YEARS JAIL SUSPENDED FOR TWO YEARS AFTER ADMITTING POSSESSION OF

COCAINE.

HE WAS ALSO PLACED UNDER A TWO YEAR SUPERVISION ORDER AND

TOLD TO PAY #2,000 COSTS.

THE 30 YEAR OLD HEIR TO THE BLENHEIM PALACE FORTUNE

– ESTIMATED AT #60 MILLION – SPENT MORE THAT #20,000 ON THE

CHAMPAGNE DRUG IN THE THREE MONTHS LEADING UP TO HIS ARREST ON

DECEMBER 13 LAST YEAR WHEN POLICE FOUND HIM IN A SQUALID USERS’ DEN

IN LONDON’S EDGWARE ROAD.

KNIGHTSBRDIGE CROWN COURT HEARD THAT BLANDFORD, DESCRIBED IN

COURT AS A ‘HOPELESS COCAINE ADDICT’, COULD HAVE DIED AT ANYTIME FROM

A BRAIN HAEMORRHAGE.

THE MARQUIS, WHO APPEARED IN COURT AS CHARLES JAMES SPENCER

CHURCHILL, REDUCED HIMSELF TO A PHYSICAL AND MENTAL WRECK WITH HIS

WHOLE LIFE REVOLVING AROUND HIS NEXT ‘FIX’.

SENTENCING HIM JUDGE HENRY POWNELL, QC, SAID: ‘IT IS QUITE

AWFUL TO SEE SOMEONE LIKE YOU, WITH SO MANY OF THE MATERIAL

ADVANTAGES OF THIS WORLD, PLEAD GUILTY TO THIS OFFENCE.

IN SOME WAYS

YOUR BACKGROUND MAKES IT WORSE’.

AND THE JUDGE ADDED: ‘NOBODY CAN FAIL TO HAVE PITY ON

SOMEONE ADDICTED TO ANY DRUG AND IT IS QUITE PLAIN TO ME YOU HAVE HIT

ROCK BOTTOM.

‘BUT YOU HAD THE WILL POWER WITH THE HELP OF OTHERS TO TRY

AND RID YOURSELF OF THE SCOURGE WHICH WAS RUNNING YOU LIFE AND WHICH

IS QUITE PLAINLY CAUSING UNIMAGINABLE DISTRESS TO THOSE WHO CARE

ABOUT YOU’.

MORE.

.

.

CENTRAL/BLANDFORD.

.

.

.

2

THE JUDGE SAID BLANDFORD, WHO WAS VISIBLY SHAKEN AS HE STOOD

QUIETLY IN THE DOCK WITH HIS HEAD BOWED, WAS OBVIOUSLY QUITE A

DIFFERENT PERSON TO THE ONE FOUND IN THE SORDID BASEMENT DRUGS DEN.

‘I ASSUME THE CHANGE IN YOU IS MORE THAN SKIN DEEP BUT DEEP

DOWN TOO.

IF THAT IS RIGHT, YOU ARE IN MUCH THE SAME POSITION IN THIS

CASE AS SAVVIDES, WITH ONE EXCEPTION: HE WAS OF GOOD CHARACTER.

YOU

ARE NOT’.

LAST WEEK ANGELOS SAVVIDES, 37 OF CABBELL STREET,

MARYLEBONE, WAS SENTENCED TO 12 MONTHS IMPRISONMENT SUSPENDED FOR TWO

YEARS AFTER HE ADMITTED ALLOWING HIS BASEMENT TO BE USED BY DRUG

TAKERS.

JUDGE POWNELL CONTINUED: ‘MANY WOULD SAY YOU HAD YOUR LAST

CHANCE EARLIER THIS YEAR.

THEY MAY BE RIGHT BUT I CANNOT FOR MY PART

BRING MYSELF TO DEAL WITH YOU IN ANY WAY THAT WOULD REVERSE THE

OBVIOUS UPWARD TREND YOU HAVE TAKEN AND THAT COURSE WOULD SIMPLY PUT

YOU BACK TO SQUARE ONE.

THAT WILL NOT DO YOU ANY GOOD’.

BUT THE JUDGE ISSUED A STERN WARNING TO THE ARISTOCRAT.

‘IF

YOU COMMIT FURTHER OFFENCES YOU WILL BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE COURT AND

CERTAINLY, AS NIGHT FOLLOWS DAY, THAT SENTENCE WILL BE ACTIVATED IN

ADDITION TO ANY OTHER SENTENCE FOR THE NEW OFFENCES’.

EARLIER BLANDFORD’S COUNSEL, MR ROBIN SIMPSON, QC, SAID HIS

CLIENT WAS DEPENDENT ON DRUGS AND ALCOHOL TO AN APPALLING EXTENT.

HE SAID THAT IN THE THREE OR FOUR MONTHS LEADING TO HIS

ARREST BLANDFORD HAD BEEN BUYING COCAINE FROM ANOTHER DEFENDANT –

GEORGE YANNAKAKIS – SPENDING #20,000, AND HAD BECOME INVOLVED IN

‘FREEBASING’ THE DRUG.

‘FRIDAY THE 13TH OF DECEMBER IS AN OMINOUS DATE, BUT IN

BLANDFORD’S CASE A LUCKY ONE BECAUSE IF HE HAD NOT BEEN ARRESTED, GOD

KNOWS WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED’, HE SAID.

‘HE REDUCED HIMSELF TO A PHYSICAL AND MENTAL WRECK.

HE WAS A

TRULY PATHETIC FIGURE.

BY SEPTEMBER LAST YEAR HIS WHOLE DAY REVOLVED

AROUND THE DRUG.

OBTAINING IT, COOKING IT AND SMOKING IT.

‘HE CRAVED FOR IT ON WAKING IN THE MORNING, HE COULD NOT

FUNCTION OR FEEL NORMAL WITHOUT IT – HE JUST LIVED FOR THE NEXT

SMOKE.

‘

MORE.

.

.

CENTRAL/BLANDFORD.

.

.

.

3

AND MR SIMPSON DESCRIBED THE WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS SUFFERED BY

A COCAINE ADDICT.

‘BECAUSE FREEBASING GIVES AN INSTANT HIGH THE CORRESPONDING

TROUGH INTO WHICH THE USER SINKS IS AS GREAT.

‘HE WAKES SWEATING, HE ACHES ALL OVER AND IS UNABLE TO

SLEEP.

HE TAKES TRANQUILISERS AND ALCOHOL IN ORDER TO SLEEP.

LORD

BLANDFORD WAS SOMETIMES CONSUMING AS MUCH AS A BOTTLE OF VODKA A DAY.

IT DID HAPPEN.

‘

HE SAID THE MARQUIS HAD BEEN AN IN-PATIENT FOR SEVEN MONTHS

AT A PRIVATE DRUGS CLINIC AND WHEN HE ARRIVED THERE HIS CLIENT

WEIGHED THREE STONE UNDER HIS NORMAL WEIGHT.

‘IN THEIR VIEW HE COULD HAVE DIED AT ANY TIME BY CEREBRAL

HAEMORRHAGE OR HEART FAILURE.

IN ANY CASE HE WAS HEADING FOR A

COMPLETE BREAKDOWN’.

COUNSEL SAID BLANDFORD HAD ALREADY SUFFERED SOME DEGREE OF

PUNISHMENT HAVING SERVED THREE MONTHS IN PRISON FOR FAILING TO CHANGE

HIS ADDRESS WHILE ON PROBATION AND ‘HE WAS BRANDED BY THE STIPENDIARY

MAGISTRATE AS A COMMON CRIMINAL – AND HE AND HIS FAMILY HAVE BEEN

SUBJECTED TO HIDEOUS PRESS PUBLICITY’.

BUT MR SIMPSON SAID IN THE FINAL ANALYSIS BLAME MUST BE

ATTRIBUTED TO BLANDFORD HIMSELF FOR THE PUBLICITY AND SHAME BROUGHT

ON HIM AND HIS FAMILY.

IN COURT LISTENING INTENTLY WAS BLANDFORD’S FATHER THE 11TH

DUKE OF MARLBOROUGH AND SISTER LADY HENRIETTA.

MR SIMPSON SAID: ‘THE DUKE HAS MADE A STATEMENT SAYING THE

LAST FEW YEARS HAVE BEEN A NIGHTMARE TO HIM AS FAR AS HIS SON AND HIS

ADDICTION HAVE BEEN CONCERNED.

‘BUT AT LAST THIS YOUNG MAN HAS COME TO HIS SENSES AND HAS A

PURPOSE TO HIS LIFE NOW WHICH LIES IN THE PLACE WHICH, PROVIDED HE

KEEPS OFF DRUGS, HE WILL ONE DAY INHERIT.

‘ONE DAY, PROVIDING HE KEEPS OFF DRUGS, HE IS GOING TO COME

INTO A GREAT INHERITANCE AND ASSUME CONSIDERABLE RESPONSIBILITY.

‘IT DOES JUST LOOK FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HIS LIFE IT IS

POSSIBLE THE FULL IMPLICATIONS OF THAT HAVE DAWNED UPON HIM’.

MORE.

.

.

CENTRAL/BLANDFORD.

.

.

.

4

ADDICTION EXPERT PROFESSOR GRIFFITHS EDWARDS, OF THE

UNIVERSITY OF LONDON, SAID BLANDFORD WAS ‘ADDICTED TO THE SEVEREST

POSSIBLE DEGREE’.

HE SAID HE SHOULD CONTINUE TREATMENT WITH A CONSULTANT

PSYCHIATRIST, ATTEND THE FARM PLACE DRUG CLINIC IN OCKLEY, SURREY,

ATTEND ALCOHOLICS AND NARCOTICS ANONYMOUS.

AND THE PROFESSOR RECOMMENDED THAT BLANDFORD HAVE REGULAR

URINE TESTS AS AN EXTRA SECURITY PRECAUTION AGAINST A RELAPSE.

BLANDFORD HAS PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS FOR ASSAULT ON POLICE,

BURGLARY WITH INTENT TO STEAL AND POSSESSION OF A SMALL AMOUNT OF

HEROIN.

ENDS